There
is a social phenomenon sociologists and their kind call “the
paradox of declining female happiness.” This phenomenon was first
noted by two researchers at the Wharton School studying 35 years of
data from the General Social Survey. What they found was that during
the time that women had increased access to education, career
opportunities, and the contraceptives that made careers possible,
there was a steady decline in the level of happiness reported by
women. Those researchers tried not to draw any conclusions, but I
think it is reasonable to explore the correlations.
Before
going any further, I think it appropriate to speak directly to you,
female reader. There is no question that you can do many things that
men do. You can be doctors, lawyers, teachers, etc. There is,
however, question that you can do all those things as men do them. I
did not say “better than” or “worse than,” I said “as.”
There is further question as to whether you should do those things,
even though you can.
One
of the possible reasons for the decline in female happiness seems to
lie in what G.K. Chesterton describes as “modern torture.” No one
denies that women have been wronged before, but as Chesterton says,
“I doubt if they were ever tortured so much as they are tortured
now by the absurd modern attempt to make them domestic empresses and
competitive clerks at the same time.” A woman’s life was never
easy, but at least she knew what she was to do with her life. She
knew she was to be a wife, a mother, a cook, a teacher, a seamstress,
a moral guide, a source of optimism for her pessimistic husband, a
dose of realism for his irrational dreaming, and more. To paraphrase
Chesterton, a woman was expected to be everything to a few people
rather than one thing to many.
Even
more, what others expected of her aligned with her natural
tendencies. No little girl ever grew up dreaming of being a rich and
powerful CEO; she grew up dreaming of her prince, with whom she would
start a family. Now, however, little girls are told that they should
not “settle” for marriage, a loving husband and father for their
children, and a life of love and care for others; rather, they should
become wealthy and successful. If she decides that a child might be
nice along the way, she can simply go to the sperm store and inject
it herself.
Our
current situation is much like the story of the original sin. There
is a great lie being spoken to insecure women and the timid and weak
men stand aside, fearful that they might be hurt, or worse, offend
someone. Instead of trying to be like God, in this case, woman is
trying to be like man, because men have failed her and hurt her. We
have lesbians because men failed to be loving and faithful men; we
have gays because the men that were replaced by women decided to fill
the void of femininity left by those women. What is to be done?
I
greatly admire those women today who have the incredible strength to
reject the lie that their work as wives and mothers is less than the
work of female accountants, teachers, doctors, or lawyers. The work
of the wife and mother is of infinitely more worth than any temporal
work she may do. Her work as wife and mother is of divine and eternal
importance. For that work to take place, she needs a man that stands
for her, fights for her, and protects her from a diseased world. We
not only need women to take the stand for themselves and reject the
lie, but we need men who will take the stand for the women they love.
I think it might be more appropriate to say that these social factors contribute to an increase in instances of homosexuality, but they are not direct causes thereof.
ReplyDeleteWell said Mr. Taffaro!
ReplyDeleteI agree with Ross about the statement made on homosexuality. Stick to one point in a blog post and state it well! I really enjoyed this post. Very appropriate for our times!
ReplyDelete